QUESTION:
Your views remind me of Christian Reconstructionist views, are they?
ANSWER:
NO! Reconstructionists erroneously believe that america was founded upon Judaeo-Christian principles or was founded upon the Laws of God and america needs to be reconstructed.
The truth is: america was not established upon God's principles. The only official document upon which america was estalished is the heathen american constitution and ten amendments. There is nothing in that document which is godly. america's constitution is an anti-God documents inspired by satan. All the laws of the states are supposed to be made in persuance to america's satanic constitution.
We advocate a complete destruction of the document america was founded on, and reestablishing america and even the world community upon the TEN COMMANDMENTS.
QUESTION:
"You rail on about the sanctity of your commandments while simultaneously ignoring the fact that EVERY civilization in human history has exulted the same basic premises. You say it is impossible for man to think up the laws of the commandments? Why then is it that the ancient Greeks, Romans, Babylonians, Incas, Muslims, Indians and American natives have all had "divine" laws saying murder, theft ect is a no-no?"
ANSWER:
Please read Romans 2:14-15. God wrote the TEN COMMANDMENTS in the heart of All MANKIND when He created the first man Adam.
QUESTION:
I ask these questions not as an attack, but to attempt to have an intelligent discussion with someone with strong beliefs. So please, take no offense to these question. I consider myself to be a good Christian (even though I do not read the Bible enough, nor do I take all the opportunities to share the Word I am given, but alas, I am an imperfect sinner). You say that the Ten Commandments were never amended, but isn't that why Christ came on the scene (i.e. "the New Covanent")?
ANSWER:
Christ did not come to amend the TEN COMMANDMENT by a New Covenant. Rather, He came to fulfill them (Matthew 5:17-19).
You must understand that Israel of old had more than one type of law under the old covenant: the Moral Law (the TEN COMMANDMENTS); the Judicial Law and the Ceremonial Law.
It was the Ceremonial laws that were annulled when Christ died on the cross. The Moral Law remains in effect because it is an eternal Law which can never be annulled. The Judicial Laws of Israel also remain in effect because they were based on the Moral Law.
QUESTION:
Also under your Justice Watch, you have all these crimes listed with the Old Testament punishments prescribed, now what role does the New Covenant have (let he without sin cast the first stone)? I would greatly appreciate you sharing your view on these concepts. Thank you JP
ANSWER:
Again, as we stated above, the Judicial Laws of Israel of old were based on God's eternal Moral Law, and therefore the Judicial Laws and the prescribed punishments cannot be annulled.
You will find no place in the Bible where God has changed or annulled any of His prescribed punishments. As long as God's Moral Laws are in existence, His prescribed punishments will always be required by Him. God does not require corporeal government to have His Law without his punishments. It is heathen man who has tried to change God's Laws and His punishments.
QUESTION:
Even Jesus respected the governing body of the land. He shows us this when he paid monies to the tax collector.
ANSWER:
Jesus only respected that which is right in the sight of God. He never showed any respect for what is wrong or evil or contrary to the will of God
LETTER WRITER'S ERRONEOUS OPINION:
Jesus also obeyed the laws of the governing bodies. To have done otherwise would have compromised his love and respect for all people.
ANSWER:
Jesus only obeyed laws that were right. You must also understand that the Jews were allowed by the Romans to practice their own laws or the laws God gave to Israel. These Laws were given to the Jews by God and were therefore just and righteous laws. One of the purposes for which Christ came into this world was to perfectly obey God's laws on behalf of God's elect.
LETTER WRITER'S ERRONEOUS OPINION:
"let he among you who is without sin cast the first stone" Notice that Jesus himself, who was without sin, did not cast the first stone. Why? Because justice shall be carried out in heaven - not on earth. This does not give man free licence to commit crimes but rather it shows that moral judgement must be left to God.
ANSWER:
You are mistaken here as to the reason Christ did not cast the first stone. You must understand that the Jews were testing Christ,"...in order that they might have grounds for accusing Him..." (John 8:6). In other words, the Jewish state could not put any one to death as their laws prescribed without permission from the Roman government. They were trying to get Christ to prescribe this punishment apart from permission from the Romans. Since Christ knew this permission had not been granted, He therefore tells them to cast the first stone.
Another fact people fail to perceive here is that Christ was not a government official of the corporeal state of Israel. He was a private citizen. He did not therefore have the authority to officially prescribe a punishment nor carry it out or forgive the sin in an official way so that she would not be punished by the corporeal government. Only those in positions of authority could do that after having gotten permission from the Romans.
Christ did however have authority to forgive sins as they pertains to the spiritual kingdom of God. And He forgave this lady. But He does not forgive everybody.
There is no evidence that the lady was forgiven by the leaders of Israel. Although Christ forgave her sin as it pertained to His kingdom to come, yet the leaders of Israel could have nevertheless gained permission from the Romans to put her to death. There is no evidence that the lady received corporeal pardon.
QUESTION:
If an eye for an eye is ture justice, then, after having killed a party guilty of murder, aren't you then also guilty of taking a life? "the one who kills a man shall be put to death"
ANSWER:
You are also greatly mistaken here. You must understand that there are at least two levels of responsibility that mankind has unto God: Responsibility on a governmental level, and responsibility on a personal level.
God requires all governments to punish evil doers or law breakers. He has endowed government with the power and authority and responsibility to put to death people who commit death worthy crimes. This is what is meant when it says, "an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth, hand for hand, life for life" and etc.
However, God has not given anyone on a personal level this authority and responsibility. So when it says "You shall not kill" it has reference to our personal responsibility. You and I do not have the right to carry out God's sentence of death, but government and those who serve in the criminal justice system has been endowed with that power and responsibility by God despite what the voting public and special interests groups want.
QUESTION:
Who are you to determine how everyone else should live?
ANSWER:
I cannot determine this. However, the one who has is the Almighty God, your Creator.
QUESTION:
Why should I pay any attention to that mindless drivel you have posted?
ANSWER:
If it is mindless drivel, then I beg you, turn a deft ear to it, and think nothing more about it. But if it is truth, you had better take heed.
QUESTION:
What makes your religion the determining factor in how we should all live?
ANSWER:
Its not my religion, but the way that is right. I did not devise the way that is right, God did. Therefore, that is the determining factor.
QUESTION:
How is your religion more right than another?
ANSWER:
If I worship the true God, then that's what makes me right. If others speak on the basis of manmade philosophies, religions, ideologies and etc, that's what makes them wrong.
QUESTION:
I have a serious question. While I may not agree with everything I've seen on your web page, this is not facetious, judgmental, or mocking. I'm honestly curious. Many of the laws you quote come from Leviticus. Do you observe the Kosher dietary laws?
(There are some other laws in Leviticus which seem inapplicable to modern life, in my opinion -- the ones governing menstruation seem somewhat, well, strange.)
Again, I'm simply curious.
ANSWER:
Thanks Tim for the questions. It is my pleasure to answer them.
You must understand that Israel of old had atleast three categories of laws: The Moral Laws (i.e. the TEN COMMANDMENTS); the Judicial laws and the Ceremonial Laws as well as others.
When Christ died on the cross, all of the laws of Israel were divinely annulled except the Moral Laws and the Judicial laws. The Moral Law remains in effect because they are eternal Laws which can never be annulled. The Judicial Laws of Israel also remain in effect because they were based on the Moral Laws.
All of the dietary laws of Israel are annulled (1 Corinthians 10:25). Israel had such laws because they were designed to typify and teach them of the "uncleanness" of sin. Others typified Christ and all were designed to lead them to Christ (Galatians 3:23-24).
The menstrual law really is a moral and cleanliness issue.
7/17/98
QUESTION:
Any validity your arguments may have is outweighed by your bigotry and religious intolerance. If God is a loving, merciful and forgiving god, how do you justify your attacks on anybody who does not conform to your particular set of religious beliefs?
ANSWER:
You called me a "bigot" and you say that I have "religious intolerance." One of the curses the principles of the american constitution has upon its gullible subjects is that it destroys their ability to understand that there are some things in the lives of mankind that must be hated and utterly rejected. There are some things which should never be tolerated.
If you carefully read the first commandment of the TEN COMMANDMENTS, you will see therein that God says to all mankind, "You shall have no other God besides Me" (Exodus 20:3). This means that we should reject or be intolerant of all philosophies, ideologies and religions that do not have reference to honor and worship of God. Anything contrary to Him must not be tolerated (Deuteronomy 13:1-11). So it is the righteous and loving God Himself who has instructed us to be intolerant to all other religions and philosophies.
God is only ONE God (Ephesians 4:3-6). Therefore He does not allow a multitude of religions and philosophies. satan is the so-called "god" that does that. Democracy was created by satan to accommodate error. Therefore there is a multitude of erroneous religions and philosophies in his kingdom. And in order for all of them to have the so-called right of existence and expression, he has dictated that his servants be TOLERANT of them all.
7/19/98
QUESTION:
"After reading the prologue to your pieces regarding the evil of atheism, I have but one question. Given that you feel atheists and other non-theists are dangerous, do you condone violence against them to stop them from their 'evils?'"
ANSWER:
Thanks for the question. It is an important one. We would like to make it absolutely clear that we do not condone any type of personal violence toward atheists, agnostics and other non believers in God.
However, we are highly in favor of the governments establishing laws against atheism and anything opposed to God. Anything opposed to God has no right to existence. Atheists blaspheme against God and commit other death worthy crimes. The governments should treat atheist as criminals.
Personal violence should not be directed towards atheists. However, citizens should not tolerate them.
7/22/98
QUESTION:
Does your finding that homosexuality is, in the Bible, on an even par with murder also apply to adulterers who were also condemned to death in the Bible?
ANSWER:
YES! Anyone who commits adultery should also be put to death! Have you ever commited adultery?
7/27/98
Question:
Your web site suggests that you want to impose your religion on everyone, even the governments. Is this true? I was always taught that America's constitution gives the citizens of America the right to believe the way they want to believe. Who are you to try to impose the Ten Commandments upon everyone?
ANSWER:
It is not I who has imposed the responsibility to perfectly obey the TEN COMMANDMENTS on every private citizen of the world community and the governments, but it is God who has done so (Romans 3:19). I'm just a voice in the wilderness trying to convince and remind private citizens and the governments of their responsibilities to God.
You must understand that God is the Creator of all mankind, and that's what make all responsible to Him alone.
The so-called freedom that comes from the first amendment to the american constitution is from satan - designed to draw you away from obedience to God. The american constitution is atheistic and therefore nullifies all responsibilities to God.
8/4/98
QUESTION:
Since the United States Constitution mandates the separation between church and state,why wouldn't it be considered treason to advocate a form of theocracy? Why should that not be considered subversive?
ANSWER:
I assume you regard yourself to be educated. If so, your degree did not teach you america's legal definition of "treason."
Treason was defined very restrictively by the framers of the Constitution. It is was because of people like you who falsely and loosely charge treason that the framers of the constitution denied congress the authority to enlarge or reshape the definition. America's definition of treason says treason shall consist only in levying War against the united states, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.
Speaking out boldly against america's moral decline is not true treason in any sense. If hatred for sin and love for God is treason, then I readily admit treason. Evil is what is ruling the united states. Therefore the evil forces should be subverted, because no evil has any right to existence and rule in any society.
Have you not read your own Declaration of Independence? America has gotten to the point that it is destructive to the God given rights of its righteous citizens. Your own declaration says, "... that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government,..."
If the Almighty God (the One to whom all americans as well as all mankind are responsible) and His righteousness are enemies to america, I readily admit that I have sided with God. And if that can rightly be defined as treason, then I am guilty.
8/7/98
QUESTION:
I'm an atheist. The Bible doesn't make sense; every denomination has different beliefs, and that makes me wonder how much the Bible has been changed over the last 2000 years; religious leaders have manipulated their profession so that they can make personal gain; religious leaders actually do things they're not supposed to do and are hypocrites; Christianity has caused many wars in the name of God and etc. Isn't that enough reason to not be a Christian?
ANSWER:
You atheistic logic and reasoning has led you to great error. Since the Bible doesn't make sense to you, why don't you make serious effort to understand it? If you perceive that every denomination has different beliefs, and that makes you wonder how much the Bible has been changed over the last 2000 years, why hasn't that caused you to think that the reason they have different beliefs is because they don't truly understand the Bible either?
If you see religious leaders who have manipulated their profession so that they can make personal gain, why can't you be a Christian who don't do the same?
It is true that a lot of religious leaders actually do things they're not supposed to do and are hypocrites, but why can't you be a Christian without being a hypocrite?
If you think Christianity has caused many wars in the name of God, why can't you be a Christian and seek peace.
Your reasons for not being a Christian are irrational. Your reasons for not being a Christian are equivalent to not desiring to be a human simply because humans steal, murder,are diseased and etc. Is that the best logic your atheism can come up with?
8/21/98
QUESTION:
Why do you reject the gospel of Jesus Christ? Like so many misled Christians, you ignore the Gospels and focus on the antiquated and irrelevant words of the Old Testament. Your hateful attitude reflects poorly on Christians and does a dishonor to the teachings of Jesus Christ. I hope that you one day achieve enlightenment.
ANSWER:
This is a typical question of a nominal professing Christian. This person would not know true Christianity even while he stared it in the face. Notice in the question, this person basically refers to the law of God as "antiquated and irrelevant" and accuses me of ignoring the gospel. Well let me ask this person and all who foolishly think like him/her to turn to the GOSPEL and read 1 Timothy 1:3-11. Notice what is stated about the Law in verses 8-10, the same Law this hypocritical so-called "christian" says is antiquated.
The law is made for lawless heathens including heathens who profess to be Christians, and that is what america is primarily made up of. Even the american constitution is lawless. The Law must always proceed the gospel so that the consciences of heathens will be awakened, they realize their total depravity and perceive their need for Christ. But most if not all professing christians think the law must be done away with, and nothing but the gospel be preached. God is a God of wrath as well as a God of love, and all of His attributes shine in their full splendor at all times.
8/29/98
QUESTION:
I am sure you website is a joke. It is people with your ideology that are dangerous. I am an atheist, but first and foremost I am a loving wife and mother, and an active member of my community. I have many Christian friends, none of whom believe I am a threat to them. If you met me and we sat and talked for an hour or so (without religious dialoge) you would have no idea I am an atheist. I am a kind, loving, compassionate, caring woman. Your website is teaching people to hate. As an atheist I hate no one. I do not hate your god, for I do not believe any gods exist. I have high moral values and standards, not because I fear going to hell or gods wrath, but because I am a human being who cares about my fellow man. I do not hate Christians, my family and most of my friends are Christian. Do they wish I believe as they do? Of course they do. Do they pray for me? You bet. But they love me for who I am, as I do them. Perhaps what you need to do is to meet some atheists, who are not interested in debating the existance of god, but just want to show you we are not out to harm you or your children. Your website challenged atheists to prove that god does not exist. Well, I cannot prove god doesn't exist, neither can I prove invisible pink unicorns do not exist, I cannot prove the Egyptian Sun god Rah does not exist. I cannot prove ghosts do not exist. Before we had a man land on the moon I could not prove it was not made out of cheese. How can one prove a negative?
ANSWER:
You just proved a negative: You proved that you ARE NOT a Christian. You also proved a positive: You prove that YOU ARE INDEED a heathen.
9/3/98
VISITOR'S OPINION:
I find your site interesting and I like what you have done with your Statue of Liberty page, I do believe that you forgot a couple things on that page though.
1. It also has givin you the right to be able to publish this site without the threat of death that you would receive in many other "God" loving countries.
2. It has givin you the right to pratice your beliefs freely by your choice, not the choice of other places on this earth.
I in no way object to what you say here, I just feel that it is better if we tell the whole story, not just one side of it.
I am not a perfect person, but I also see that because of this country, I have the chance to do things that I would not do elsewhere, good and bad.
Lets not leave all the good out.
Good luck to you and keep up the good job on the site.
RESPONSE:
There are many who express the same opinion as you have, but all of you are mistaken.
It is a great mistake for anyone to think that the statue of liberty, or better, the first amendment to the american constitution gives true Christianity and true Christians the freedom to express themselves in america. He who thinks such does not understand the satanic nature of the constitution and its amendments and how utterly anti-God, ant-Christ and anti Christian it is. The truth is: the first amendments gives freedom of expression to every manmade and demonic ideology, philosophy and religion there is; but it does not extend such to true Christianity. Oh yes, it allows the expression of fake Christianity, but not true Christianity.
All you have to do is express true Christian principles and the inverterate wrath against true Christianity is awkened in the outworkings of the constitution. This wrath manifests itself in the foolish patriots of america and in the government fighting against those principles. Everything in the society comes into play to try to destroy true Christianity.
So it is not the constitution or the first amendment giving any true Christian the freedom to express true Christian principles, but it is God. God has given me the right to place this type of site on the web, not the satanic first amendment.
9/30/98
QUESTION:
Ok, you have stated that what you mean by a death penalty actually is a physical death. You have also said that blaspheme against God is a death worthy crime. Then, by that very definition, atheism would be a death worthy crime. You have also stated that you were once an atheist.
So my question is, if you were an atheist, by your very own rules, shouldn't you have been killed before you were able to convert? I know somewhere I must be wrong, I just don't know where. A little clarification would be much help.
Thanks for your kindness,
ANSWER:
Yes, you are right. I believe in the death penalty not only for others, but also for myself. One thing that genuine Christians acknowledge and bow to is the justice of God. If I commit a death worthy crime, I realize that God's justice requires my death like it does any other person who commits a death worthy crime. So if I commit such a crime, I bow to the justice of God by admitting my guilt and my worthiness for death. I would be ready to die. I would not seek to escape the justice of God.
Yes, as an atheist, I committed many crimes for which I am now deeply ashamed and for which I should have been put to death for had this nation had the proper form of government. But where there is such a government, peoples' death worthy crimes are generally restrained.
Oh, by the way, if any member of my family should commit a death worthy crime, I would expect the government to carry out the proper justice. I would not seek to save them from God's death penalty.
12/9/98
I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR SITE
1. Are atheists evil or confused?
Both: thoroughly depraved and confused
2. Would establishment of the ten commandments mean overthrowing the government?
The TEN COMMANDMENTS are the antitheisis of the american constitution and its amendments - they are the antithesis of democracy. Therefore the establishment of the TEN COMMANDMENTS would mean their overthrow. But a new and right government under God would be established.
3. If so would the new government have election? Who would be in charge?
No elections by the people. The government would choose the leaders according to God's standards. Those who serve in public trust would have to undergo a moral litmus test. Leaders would be chosen who fear God and hate dishonest gain and etc.
4. Do you consider your website a "hate site"?
One one hand , yes; on the other hand, no. One the one hand it is a hate site against all that is evil in God's sight. "Hate evil you who love the Lord." On the other, it is a site of love. Only those who truly hate evil can rightly love their worthy fellow man.
5. What do you plan on doing to the Atheists?
The type government that I would like to see established would not allow atheists the freedom to deny God's exitence, speak against Him and His cause in any way or blasphem Him. All who do so would be put to death. At the initial stage of this government, atheist would probably have to be banished from the nation or put to death.
6. What happens to the buddhists, jews and pagans?
The same applies to these also as well as to all true non believers in God.
7. Do you ever have doubts?
I have no doubts about the existence of God. I have no doubts about mankind's responsibilities to God. I have no doubts about governments responsibility to God. I have no doubts about the proper form of government that should rule over man. I have no doubts that democracy is satanic. I have no doubts about the superiority of the TEN COMMANDMENTS. I have no doubts about the high criminality of atheism and other heathen beliefs. I have no doubts that I am right.
8. Who is worse an Atheist or a gay Christian?
There is no such thing as a "gay Christian." No true Christian is gay. There are many heathens that call themselves Christians. A goat that calls himself a sheep is not truly a sheep simply because he calls himself such. A person who is gay and calls himself a Christian is worse than many atheists. Let there be the Death Penalty by the government for such a one.
9. Do you think most people agree with you?
No. Most people disagree. However I do not follow a multitude who does evil. God is greater than the majority. God is greater than all. I agree with the righteous God, not totally depraved mankind.
10. would role-playing games and rock & roll be outlawed?
Yes
11. Are you a Nazi?
I'm A GENUINE CHRISTIAN.
12. Do you plan on establishing the Ten Commandments just in America or the world?
THE WORLD
13. Whats your favorite color?
God's Righteousness
14. Why do you concetrate on Atheists and not the other "heathens"
I'm against all heatheism
15. jesus talked about love and peace don't you think you are doing the opposite?
You are not aware of everthing Jesus taught (Matthews 10:34-39 for example). Those who would practice all the teachings of Jesus cannot have peace with any evil, regardless of the sources of evil. I love everyone who has not commited a death worthy crime. Once they commit death worthy crimes, I hate them. There is a time to hate as well as a time to love. Hatred is very healthy and constructive when it is directed towards the proper source. The proper source is all that is evil in God's sight. No, I am not doing the opposite.
16. Is it really wrong to have long hair? It is not a death worthy crime. However God forbids men to do so and therefore it is evil.
2/10/99
QUESTIONS:
"I am curious about one of the examples in your justice section. Concerning the matter of incest, who exactly is to be put to death? From the passage it seems both parties must be executed; does this hold true in the case of molestation? For example, if a father FORCES himself upon the daughter, is she also to be killed? I am a bit confused at this, as it seem she has not commit incest, but rather has been the victim of rape. I assure this is not a heathen email; I simply wish clarification on that particular case. While the passages of Leviticus 20:11-12 help explain the situation, I wish further explanation on what the law requires. This is not a mocking email, simply a genuine question. Thank you for your time."
ANSWER:
No, the daughter should not be put to death. Only the father. If the father forces himself upon his daughter, but the daughter is not in favor of the evil act but detests it and does not participate but screams and cries out loud, she is not a participant but a victim and therefore she should be spared. But no mercy whatsoever should be had for her father by the government even if he were president. God only holds the offender guilty not the victim. If such an awful act should take place, the girl should thereafter detest her father and should do all she can to have him properly punished with death by the government.
However, if the girl tries to protect her father and keeps the evil act of her father secret by refusing to report the crime to law enforcement officials, to her mother, other relatives and etc, she becomes guilty. She should first report the crime to her teacher and law enforcement officials because there may be relatives who will seek to convince her to remain quite. If her father is a high official - a sheriff, mayor, governor or a federal official such as a judge, president or legislator, it is likely that government officials will also try to cover the crime and get the daughter to be quite. In this case she should try to inform someone whom she knows will not try to cover the crime and keep her quite. So she should inform a genuine Christian. In some cases, as low down as the news media is, it may help.
But if her father is rich or is a government official of some type and she rightly insists on not remaining quite, she is likely to be accused of making up a lie against her father. But she should not give up. If anyone is in a situation of this kind, and if they desire to do so, they can inform me about it, and I guarantee that I will not seek to protect and keep quite the crimes of any rich person or government official, regardless of who he or she may be.
Also, its possible for the girl to get pregnant from her father having raped her. In this case, the incentive will be much stronger towards remaining quite and for others to try to convince the girl to remain quite. And alas, the matter of abortion will immediately surface its ugly head. However, regardless of what anyone says, the girl should not have an abortion. She will have strong temptations to do so and others will try to force her to do so, but just as she did not participate in the rape but was against her father raping her and she became the victim, she should also strongly resist having an abortion. Otherwise, she becomes guilty of murder of an innocent human being and victimizes her baby just as her father victimized her. If she has an abortion, she may as well have participated in the act of incest with her father. Regardless of what anyone says, she should not have the abortion!!
If it is insisted that the girl have an abortion, she should consider the following facts: Who is the one who actually commited crime, and who are the ones who are innocent in this case? Since her father is the guilty one and the girl and the innocent human embryo or fetus she has conceived by her father is even more innocent, if anyone should die, it should be the guilty one. If the girl should be spared because she is innocent, much more should the innocent baby be spared since he/she is even more an innocent and helpless victim. Death should only be imposed upon a person as the wages of sin or high crime, not as the wages of innocence and victimization. If the innocent girl has her baby murdered through abortion, she is no longer innocent, but has become guilty of murdering an innocent and helpless human being. As a result of the abortion, the girl becomes worthy of death just as her father who raped her. This type murder is a greater crime than the act of rape which her father committed against her.